This desktop was built by a local computer store. I am looking at upgrading this computer as it is now several (about 3 or 4) years old and thought the information from the benchmark test will help me to compare the specifications with a new machine. I found this thread very interesting and am grateful for the link to Nova Bench. Floating Point Operations/Second: 49994904 I firmly believe it is an issue that no amount of computer speed will resolve. ( I still have the 640 GB drive for storage, But Nova-Bench only reads the primary drive ) On the other hand, the note taking issue is still intermittent. It simply does not reflect the actual gains the SSD provided. However, the Nova-Bench score only increased from 1354 to 1382. The startup time of Logos was reduced from 10-12 sec. ( as demonstrated by your 2 drives, The larger one scores better, even though the write speed is much slower.) In my case, I upgraded to an 80GB SSD from a 640GB 7200 drive. They score big for a massive HD whereas Logos only benefits from the GBs it takes to store the software and resources. They see a need for large storage capacity. Nova-bench rates on a scale designed to analyze the overall computing experience. I think what confuses us is the thought that bench scores will automatically Translate to better performance where Logos is concerned. I'd really like to know which specs Logos 4 prefers. I may be wrong, but that's what I see at a first glance. I note that it doesn't seem to weight RAM volume and speed or videocard RAM volume quite as highly, and the apparent preference for cards which do well in OpenGL is interesting. Pity NovaBench tests the system drive by default, not the drive on which Logos is installed (130 MB/s write speed).įloating Point Operations/Second: 205538288įrom the look of this thread, Novabench is weighted towards videocards which perform well in OpenGL (rather than DirectX), and fast hard drives. Home built system, specifications in my sig. Would not a SSD increase the score and if so increase performance some? I thought I did my research before buying, but this is not adding up. Secondly, the Toshiba Hardware test scored 27 while my Asus only 19 (both are 7200PPM). w/ Asus: 1.73GHz 1734 MHz (although burst speeds of the i7 are supposed to be much higher). My first guess is CPU related, but the score of Asus crushed my Toshiba but the Toshiba CPU speed is: 2.26GHz 2267 MHz comp. So what do these scores mean in terms of better performance / faster searches / etc. Floating Point Operations/Second: 202536128 Floating Point Operations/Second: 50765882 ![]() Graphics Card: Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family Do you mean A SDD hard drive (like what Abi upgraded to) will not make searches "snappier" ? will not noticibly affect speed / performance of L4? Why? And maybe the answers will help us Logos users in the future when we go to upgrade again.īTW - Dave, you said the HD write speed and primary partition capacity is pretty much a non - factor with Logos. The score of my old one (Toshiba duo-core) is about one third of the new one (Asus G73JW) but the increase in speed with Logos is not (`3x faster) what I would have expected. I like being able to gauge the strengths of my old laptop compared to my new one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |